State v. Ingenito

106 A.2d 3, 16 N.J. 36, 1954 N.J. LEXIS 194
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided June 21, 1954·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion per curiam in the court below.

For affirmance — Chief Justice Vanderbilt, and Justices Heher, Olipitant, Wacheneeld, Burling, Jacobs and Brennan — 7.

For reversal — Done.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Ingenito, 106 A.2d 3, 16 N.J. 36, 1954 N.J. LEXIS 194 (N.J. 1954).

106 A.2d 3 (State v. Ingenito) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Clark
855 P.2d 729 (California Supreme Court, 1993)
In re Dandridge
186 F. Supp. 276 (D. New Jersey, 1960)
Barber v. Gladden
332 P.2d 641 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1958)