State v. Ingenito

106 A.2d 3, 16 N.J. 36, 1954 N.J. LEXIS 194
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedJune 21, 1954
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 106 A.2d 3 (State v. Ingenito) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Ingenito, 106 A.2d 3, 16 N.J. 36, 1954 N.J. LEXIS 194 (N.J. 1954).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion per curiam in the court below.

For affirmance — Chief Justice Vanderbilt, and Justices Heher, Olipitant, Wacheneeld, Burling, Jacobs and Brennan — 7.

For reversal — Done.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Clark
855 P.2d 729 (California Supreme Court, 1993)
In re Dandridge
186 F. Supp. 276 (D. New Jersey, 1960)
Barber v. Gladden
332 P.2d 641 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1958)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
106 A.2d 3, 16 N.J. 36, 1954 N.J. LEXIS 194, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-ingenito-nj-1954.