Home/Supreme Court of Connecticut/State v. Indrisano

State v. Indrisano

617 A.2d 168, 224 Conn. 914, 1992 Conn. LEXIS 401
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedOctober 30, 1992
DocketSC 14631
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 617 A.2d 168 (State v. Indrisano) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Indrisano, 617 A.2d 168, 224 Conn. 914, 1992 Conn. LEXIS 401 (Colo. 1992).

Opinion

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 29 Conn. App. 283 (AC 10659), is granted, limited to the following questions:

“1. Was the Appellate Court correct in concluding that the record was insufficient, pursuant to State v. Golding, 213 Conn. 233 (1989), to permit adequate appellate review of the defendant’s claims that, on its face and as applied, General Statutes § 53a-182 was void for vagueness under the state and federal constitutions?

“2. Is General Statutes § 53a-182 void for vagueness on its face and as applied to this case, under the state and federal constitutions?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Indrisano
640 A.2d 986 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
617 A.2d 168, 224 Conn. 914, 1992 Conn. LEXIS 401, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-indrisano-conn-1992.