State v. In the Interest of R. L. J.

356 So. 2d 294, 1978 Fla. LEXIS 4714
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided March 2, 1978·No. No. 50253·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We issued a writ of certiorari in this cause. Upon hearing argument and upon further consideration of the matter, we are of the opinion that certiorari should not be granted.

The writ is hereby discharged.

It is so ordered.

BOYD, ENGLAND, HATCHETT and KARL, JJ., concur. OVERTON, C. J., and SUNDBERG, J., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. In the Interest of R. L. J., 356 So. 2d 294, 1978 Fla. LEXIS 4714 (Fla. 1978).

356 So. 2d 294 (State v. In the Interest of R. L. J.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Walls
356 So. 2d 294 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1978)