State v. I.M.
This text of 114 So. 3d 351 (State v. I.M.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed. See § 775.021(1), Fla. Stat. (2012) (“The provisions of this code and [352]*352offenses defined by other statutes shall be strictly construed; when the language is susceptible of differing constructions, it shall be construed most favorably to the accused.”); see also State v. Byars, 823 So.2d 740, 742 (Fla.2002) (“One of the most fundamental principles of Florida law is that penal statutes must be strictly construed according to their letter. Therefore, any ambiguity or situations in which statutory language is susceptible to differing constructions must be resolved in favor of the person charged with an offense.”) (citations and quotation omitted).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
114 So. 3d 351, 2013 WL 1978139, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 7823, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-im-fladistctapp-2013.