State v. I.M.

114 So. 3d 351, 2013 WL 1978139, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 7823
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 15, 2013
DocketNo. 3D12-2409
StatusPublished

This text of 114 So. 3d 351 (State v. I.M.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. I.M., 114 So. 3d 351, 2013 WL 1978139, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 7823 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See § 775.021(1), Fla. Stat. (2012) (“The provisions of this code and [352]*352offenses defined by other statutes shall be strictly construed; when the language is susceptible of differing constructions, it shall be construed most favorably to the accused.”); see also State v. Byars, 823 So.2d 740, 742 (Fla.2002) (“One of the most fundamental principles of Florida law is that penal statutes must be strictly construed according to their letter. Therefore, any ambiguity or situations in which statutory language is susceptible to differing constructions must be resolved in favor of the person charged with an offense.”) (citations and quotation omitted).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Byars
823 So. 2d 740 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
114 So. 3d 351, 2013 WL 1978139, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 7823, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-im-fladistctapp-2013.