State v. Illinois Central Railroad Company

286 N.W. 359, 205 Minn. 621, 1939 Minn. LEXIS 812
Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided June 16, 1939·No. No. 32,158.·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Defendant appeals from the judgment entered in the court below after the orders denying the motions of both parties for amended findings or a new trial were affirmed. Decision filed February 17, 1939', rehearing denied March 14, 1939. State v. Illinois Cent. R. Co. 205 Minn. 1, 284 N. W. 360.

The errors assigned and urged on this appeal were presented on the former appeal, and the decision therein must be considered final so far as this court is concerned. It having been found that the Burlington formula for computing the tax on freight car per diem earnings was proper and that the one proposed by defendant “is not a better formula than the Burlington,” it follows that the tax computed according to the Burlington formula violates no provision of the constitution of this state, and we are unable to see that the fourteenth amendment or any other provision of the federal constitution is violated by the judgment rendered.

The judgment is affirmed.

Mr. Justice Hilton and Mr. Justice' Peterson took no part.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Illinois Central Railroad Company, 286 N.W. 359, 205 Minn. 621, 1939 Minn. LEXIS 812 (Mich. 1939).

286 N.W. 359 (State v. Illinois Central Railroad Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Almer Railway Equipment Co. v. Commissioner of Taxation
5 N.W.2d 637 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1942)
State v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.
299 N.W. 657 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1941)
Llinois Central Railroad v. Minnesota
309 U.S. 157 (Supreme Court, 1940)