State v. Illinois Central Railroad Company
This text of 286 N.W. 359 (State v. Illinois Central Railroad Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Defendant appeals from the judgment entered in the court below after the orders denying the motions of both parties for amended findings or a new trial were affirmed. Decision filed February 17, 1939', rehearing denied March 14, 1939. State v. Illinois Cent. R. Co. 205 Minn. 1, 284 N. W. 360.
The errors assigned and urged on this appeal were presented on the former appeal, and the decision therein must be considered final so far as this court is concerned. It having been found that the Burlington formula for computing the tax on freight car per diem earnings was proper and that the one proposed by defendant “is not a better formula than the Burlington,” it follows that the tax computed according to the Burlington formula violates no provision of the constitution of this state, and we are unable to see that the fourteenth amendment or any other provision of the federal constitution is violated by the judgment rendered.
The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
286 N.W. 359, 205 Minn. 621, 1939 Minn. LEXIS 812, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-illinois-central-railroad-company-minn-1939.