State v. Ilgner
This text of 105 P. 14 (State v. Ilgner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Kansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
H. Ilgner was charged with having violated an order of injunction made by the court of common pleas of Wyandotte county prohibiting him from selling intoxicating liquor at, a certain building in Kansas City', Kan. Upon the trial it was shown that he sold at such place liquors known as and called “Gold Foam” and “Health Malt.” Whether these liquors were intoxicating or not was the chief question in dispute upon the trial. The court found and decided that they were intoxicating. There was ample evidence to justify this finding, and therefore that question can not be inquired into by this court.
The plea that he did not know it was intoxicating is unavailing. A man who sells’ liquor as a beverage must know that it is not intoxicating. He, and not the state, takes the chances.
The judgment of the court is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
105 P. 14, 81 Kan. 203, 1909 Kan. LEXIS 338, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-ilgner-kan-1909.