State v. Icard
662 S.E.2d 668, 362 N.C. 367, 2008 N.C. LEXIS 477
This text of 662 S.E.2d 668 (State v. Icard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State v. Icard, 662 S.E.2d 668, 362 N.C. 367, 2008 N.C. LEXIS 477 (N.C. 2008).
Opinion
STATE of North Carolina
v.
Lori Shannon ICARD.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Derrick C. Mertz, Assistant Attorney General, James C. Gaither, Jr., District Attorney, for State of NC.
C. Scott Holmes, Durham, for Icard.
ORDER
Upon consideration of the petition filed by State of NC on the 23rd day of May 2008 for Writ' of Supersedeas of the judgment of the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:
"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 23rd day of May 2008."
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
State v. Isenhour
670 S.E.2d 264 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2008)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
662 S.E.2d 668, 362 N.C. 367, 2008 N.C. LEXIS 477, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-icard-nc-2008.