Home/Connecticut Appellate Court/State v. Ibrahim

State v. Ibrahim

772 A.2d 680, 62 Conn. App. 634, 2001 Conn. App. LEXIS 174
CourtConnecticut Appellate Court
DecidedApril 10, 2001
DocketAC 19707
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 772 A.2d 680 (State v. Ibrahim) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Appellate Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Ibrahim, 772 A.2d 680, 62 Conn. App. 634, 2001 Conn. App. LEXIS 174 (Colo. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The defendant, Khalid Ibrahim, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of felony murder in violation of General Statutes § 53a-54c and kidnapping in the first degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-92 (a) (2) (A). The defendant’s claims are virtually identical to the claims raised in State v. Vicente, 62 Conn. App. 625, 772 A.2d 643 (2001).1 We, therefore, dispose of the claims here in the same fashion and for the same reasons as in State v. Vicente, supra, 625.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ibrahim v. Commissioner of Correction
229 Conn. App. 658 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2024)
Garcia, D. v. Foot Locker Retail, Inc.
293 A.3d 262 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2023)
Garcia, D. v. American Eagle Outfitters, Inc.
293 A.3d 252 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2023)
State v. Ibrahim
774 A.2d 139 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
772 A.2d 680, 62 Conn. App. 634, 2001 Conn. App. LEXIS 174, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-ibrahim-connappct-2001.