State v. Ibrahim
772 A.2d 680, 62 Conn. App. 634, 2001 Conn. App. LEXIS 174
Opinion
The defendant, Khalid Ibrahim, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of felony murder in violation of General Statutes § 53a-54c and kidnapping in the first degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-92 (a) (2) (A). The defendant’s claims are virtually identical to the claims raised in State v. Vicente, 62 Conn. App. 625, 772 A.2d 643 (2001).1 We, therefore, dispose of the claims here in the same fashion and for the same reasons as in State v. Vicente, supra, 625.
The judgment is affirmed.
Footnotes
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Ibrahim, 772 A.2d 680, 62 Conn. App. 634, 2001 Conn. App. LEXIS 174 (Colo. Ct. App. 2001).
772 A.2d 680 (State v. Ibrahim) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Ibrahim v. Commissioner of Correction
229 Conn. App. 658 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2024)
Garcia, D. v. Foot Locker Retail, Inc.
293 A.3d 262 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2023)
Garcia, D. v. American Eagle Outfitters, Inc.
293 A.3d 252 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2023)
State v. Ibrahim
774 A.2d 139 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2001)