State v. Iacona

Ohio Supreme Court

State v. Iacona

744 N.E.2d 1193, 91 Ohio St. 3d 1479, 2001 Ohio LEXIS 922

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedMarch 30, 2001

Docket00-495

StatusPublished

This text of 744 N.E.2d 1193 (State v. Iacona) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Iacona, 744 N.E.2d 1193, 91 Ohio St. 3d 1479, 2001 Ohio LEXIS 922 (Ohio 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

Medina App. No. 2891-M. This cause is pending before the court upon our allowance of discretionary review. On review of the record before the court,

IT IS 'NOTICED that neither copy of the trial transcript forwarded to this court contains an App.R. 9(B) certification by the official court reporter.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, sua sponte, that, within twenty days of this entry, the parties brief the following issue:

“Whether, pursuant to App.R. 9, the trial transcript is part of the record on appeal.”

The brief shall not exceed ten numbered pages, exclusive of the table of contents, the table of authorities cited, and the appendix. No responsive brief may be filed.

Resnick, J., dissents in part because she would permit responsive briefs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI