State v. I. S. S.
1 Tyl. 178
Opinion
We consider the State Attorney’s prerogative of entering a nolle prosequi to be'suspended while the cause is in issue to the Jury. He cannot then enter without leave of Court.
The defence here is ample and honourable to the accused. He is entitled to a verdict. Let the trial proceed.
The Jury returned a verdict of non out. and defendant was discharged.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. I. S. S., 1 Tyl. 178 (Vt. 1801).
1 Tyl. 178 (State v. I. S. S.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Persons
96 A.2d 818 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1953)
State v. Deso
1 A.2d 710 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1938)
State v. Champeau
52 Vt. 313 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1880)
Commonwealth v. Stedman
53 Mass. 444 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1847)