State v. I. J. C.
325 P.3d 756, 262 Or. App. 178
Opinion
Appellant seeks reversal of a judgment committing him pursuant to ORS 426.130. Appellant argues that, contrary to the trial court’s ruling, the record does not establish by clear and convincing evidence that he is unable to provide for his basic needs because of a mental disorder. See ORS 426.005(l)(e). The state concedes that the evidence is legally insufficient for involuntary commitment and that the judgment should be reversed. We agree, accept the state’s concession, and reverse.
Reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. I. J. C., 325 P.3d 756, 262 Or. App. 178 (Or. Ct. App. 2014).
325 P.3d 756 (State v. I. J. C.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.