State v. I. G.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

State v. I. G.

344 Or. App. 577

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedOctober 29, 2025

DocketA186132

StatusUnpublished

This text of 344 Or. App. 577 (State v. I. G.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. I. G., 344 Or. App. 577 (Or. Ct. App. 2025).

Pincite

Opinion

No. 945 October 29, 2025 577

This is a nonprecedential memorandum opinion pursuant to ORAP 10.30 and may not be cited except as provided in ORAP 10.30(1).

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON

In the Matter of I. G., a Person Alleged to have Mental Illness. STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. I. G., Appellant. Multnomah County Circuit Court 24CC07041; A186132

Monica M. Herranz, Judge. Submitted September 12, 2025. Liza Langford filed the brief for appellant. Jona J. Maukonen, Assistant Attorney General, waived appearance for respondent. Before Lagesen, Chief Judge, and Egan, Judge. LAGESEN, C. J. Affirmed. 578 State v. I. G.

LAGESEN, C. J. Appellant challenges a judgment committing him to the custody of the Oregon Health Authority for up to 180 days. His appointed counsel filed a brief pursuant to ORAP 5.90(4) and State v. Balfour, 311 Or 434, 814 P2d 1069 (1991). The brief does not contain a Section B. See ORAP 5.90(1)(b). We affirm.1 A civil commitment hearing occurred in November 2024. Based on the evidence and testimony at the hearing, the trial court found that appellant suffered from a men- tal disorder and was unable to provide for his basic needs. See ORS 426.005(1)(f)(B); ORS 426.130(1)(a)(C). Having reviewed the record, including the trial court file and the transcript of the civil commitment hearing, and having reviewed the Balfour brief, we have identified no arguably meritorious issues. Affirmed.

1 As authorized by ORS 2.570(2)(b), this matter is determined by a two-judge panel.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

No. 945 October 29, 2025 577

This is a nonprecedential memorandum opinion pursuant to ORAP 10.30 and may not be cited except as provided in ORAP 10.30(1).

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON

In the Matter of I. G., a Person Alleged to have Mental Illness. STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. I. G., Appellant. Multnomah County Circuit Court 24CC07041; A186132

Monica M. Herranz, Judge. Submitted September 12, 2025. Liza Langford filed the brief for appellant. Jona J. Maukonen, Assistant Attorney General, waived appearance for respondent. Before Lagesen, Chief Judge, and Egan, Judge. LAGESEN, C. J. Affirmed. 578 State v. I. G.

LAGESEN, C. J. Appellant challenges a judgment committing him to the custody of the Oregon Health Authority for up to 180 days. His appointed counsel filed a brief pursuant to ORAP 5.90(4) and State v. Balfour, 311 Or 434, 814 P2d 1069 (1991). The brief does not contain a Section B. See ORAP 5.90(1)(b). We affirm.1 A civil commitment hearing occurred in November 2024. Based on the evidence and testimony at the hearing, the trial court found that appellant suffered from a men- tal disorder and was unable to provide for his basic needs. See ORS 426.005(1)(f)(B); ORS 426.130(1)(a)(C). Having reviewed the record, including the trial court file and the transcript of the civil commitment hearing, and having reviewed the Balfour brief, we have identified no arguably meritorious issues. Affirmed.

1 As authorized by ORS 2.570(2)(b), this matter is determined by a two-judge panel.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

344 Or. App. 577, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-i-g-orctapp-2025.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack