State v. Hynes

554 P.2d 1030, 27 Or. App. 37, 1976 Ore. App. LEXIS 1298
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided October 4, 1976·No. No. MI 42596, CA 6114·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

SLOAN, S. J.

The court below, in this mental commitment hearing, took judicial notice of the record of a prior commitment proceeding concerning David Hynes. State v. O’Neill, 274 Or 59, 545 P2d 97 (1976), held that judicial notice of prior court files was improper. The state, however, argues that O’Neill is inapplicable where the judicial notice is taken in the dispositional "phase” of a commitment hearing rather than in the adjudicative phase of the hearing. We must disagree. Whether or not ORS ch 426 now provides for a separate dispositional "phase” of the commitment process, we read State v. O’Neill, supra, as precluding taking judicial notice of prior court files in any event.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Hynes, 554 P.2d 1030, 27 Or. App. 37, 1976 Ore. App. LEXIS 1298 (Or. Ct. App. 1976).

554 P.2d 1030 (State v. Hynes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Matter of Fry
584 P.2d 354 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1978)