State v. Hyde

746 So. 2d 1188, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 16558, 1999 WL 1115443
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 8, 1999·No. No. 99-1569·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Payton v. New York, 445 U.S. 573, 586, 100 S.Ct. 1371, 63 L.Ed.2d 639 (1980); Coolidge v. New Hampshire, 403 U.S. 443, 468, 91 S.Ct. 2022, 29 L.Ed.2d 564 (1971); Horton v. California, 496 U.S. 128, 137 n. 7, 110 S.Ct. 2301, 110 L.Ed.2d 112 (1990).

DELL, GUNTHER and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Hyde, 746 So. 2d 1188, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 16558, 1999 WL 1115443 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

746 So. 2d 1188 (State v. Hyde) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Melton v. State
746 So. 2d 1188 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)