State v. Hyde

Connecticut Appellate Court

State v. Hyde

526 A.2d 1351, 11 Conn. App. 809, 1987 Conn. App. LEXIS 996

Connecticut Appellate Court·Decided June 12, 1987·No. 5164·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The defendant challenges the constitutional validity of identification procedures used by the state. We have afforded the defendant’s claims of error the appropriate scope of review, and we find nothing [810]*810to support the defendant’s contention that the procedures were impermissibly suggestive. See, e.g., Manson v. Brathwaite, 432 U.S. 98, 97 S. Ct. 2243, 53 L. Ed. 2d 140 (1977); Neil v. Biggers, 409 U.S. 188, 93 S. Ct. 375, 34 L. Ed. 2d 401 (1972); State v. Hamele, 188 Conn. 372, 377, 449 A.2d 1020 (1982); State v. DeJesus, 7 Conn. App. 309, 315, 508 A.2d 463 (1986).

There is no error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The defendant challenges the constitutional validity of identification procedures used by the state. We have afforded the defendant’s claims of error the appropriate scope of review, and we find nothing [810]*810to support the defendant’s contention that the procedures were impermissibly suggestive. See, e.g., Manson v. Brathwaite, 432 U.S. 98, 97 S. Ct. 2243, 53 L. Ed. 2d 140 (1977); Neil v. Biggers, 409 U.S. 188, 93 S. Ct. 375, 34 L. Ed. 2d 401 (1972); State v. Hamele, 188 Conn. 372, 377, 449 A.2d 1020 (1982); State v. DeJesus, 7 Conn. App. 309, 315, 508 A.2d 463 (1986).

There is no error.

State v. Hyde, 526 A.2d 1351, 11 Conn. App. 809, 1987 Conn. App. LEXIS 996 (Colo. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

526 A.2d 1351 (State v. Hyde) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related