State v. Hutton

Ohio Supreme Court

State v. Hutton

2017 Ohio 7742, 150 Ohio St. 3d 1438

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedSeptember 22, 2017

Docket1988-1074

StatusPublished

This text of 2017 Ohio 7742 (State v. Hutton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Hutton, 2017 Ohio 7742, 150 Ohio St. 3d 1438 (Ohio 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

Cuyahoga App. No. 51704. On appellant/cross-appellee’s motion to set an execution date. Motion granted. Percy Hutton’s sentence shall be carried into execution by the warden of the Southern Ohio Correctional Facility, or in his absence, by the deputy warden, on Wednesday, June 22, 2022, in accordance with the statutes so provided.

O’Neill, J., dissents for the reasons set forth in his dissenting opinion in State v. Wogenstahl, 134 Ohio St.3d 1437, 2013-Ohio-164, 981 N.E.2d 900.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cuyahoga App. No. 51704. On appellant/cross-appellee’s motion to set an execution date. Motion granted. Percy Hutton’s sentence shall be carried into execution by the warden of the Southern Ohio Correctional Facility, or in his absence, by the deputy warden, on Wednesday, June 22, 2022, in accordance with the statutes so provided.

O’Neill, J., dissents for the reasons set forth in his dissenting opinion in State v. Wogenstahl, 134 Ohio St.3d 1437, 2013-Ohio-164, 981 N.E.2d 900.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2017 Ohio 7742, 150 Ohio St. 3d 1438, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-hutton-ohio-2017.