State v. Hustead

Court of Appeals of Oregon

State v. Hustead

848 P.2d 147, 118 Or. App. 732, 1993 Ore. App. LEXIS 454

Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided March 17, 1993·No. W902599; CA A70506·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Defendant appeals his conviction for driving under the influence of intoxicants. ORS 813.010. He contends that the court erred in denying his motion to suppress the results of a blood alcohol test performed at the hospital where he was taken for treatment after an automobile accident. He also challenges a probation condition.

We affirm the conviction without further discussion, but remand for resentencing. The state concedes that the court did not follow ORS 137.540 in ordering defendant to submit to random body substance testing and search of his person, residence, vehicles and property as a condition of probation. We accept that concession.

Conviction affirmed; remanded for resentencing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

Defendant appeals his conviction for driving under the influence of intoxicants. ORS 813.010. He contends that the court erred in denying his motion to suppress the results of a blood alcohol test performed at the hospital where he was taken for treatment after an automobile accident. He also challenges a probation condition.

We affirm the conviction without further discussion, but remand for resentencing. The state concedes that the court did not follow ORS 137.540 in ordering defendant to submit to random body substance testing and search of his person, residence, vehicles and property as a condition of probation. We accept that concession.

Conviction affirmed; remanded for resentencing.

State v. Hustead, 848 P.2d 147, 118 Or. App. 732, 1993 Ore. App. LEXIS 454 (Or. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

848 P.2d 147 (State v. Hustead) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related