State v. Hustead
This text of 848 P.2d 147 (State v. Hustead) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Defendant appeals his conviction for driving under the influence of intoxicants. ORS 813.010. He contends that the court erred in denying his motion to suppress the results of a blood alcohol test performed at the hospital where he was taken for treatment after an automobile accident. He also challenges a probation condition.
We affirm the conviction without further discussion, but remand for resentencing. The state concedes that the court did not follow ORS 137.540 in ordering defendant to submit to random body substance testing and search of his person, residence, vehicles and property as a condition of probation. We accept that concession.
Conviction affirmed; remanded for resentencing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
848 P.2d 147, 118 Or. App. 732, 1993 Ore. App. LEXIS 454, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-hustead-orctapp-1993.