State v. Hurtado

549 A.2d 428, 113 N.J. 1, 1988 N.J. LEXIS 110
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided November 7, 1988·Published·Cited by 16 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the Appellate Division is reversed, the matter is remanded to the trial court to permit defendant to retract his guilty plea, substantially for the reasons expressed in the dissenting opinion of Judge Skillman, reported at 219 N.J.Super. 12, 23 (1987).

For reversal and remandment — Chief Justice WILENTZ, and Justices CLIFFORD, HANDLER, POLLOCK, O’HERN, GARIBALDI and STEIN — 7.

Opposed —None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Hurtado, 549 A.2d 428, 113 N.J. 1, 1988 N.J. LEXIS 110 (N.J. 1988).

549 A.2d 428 (State v. Hurtado) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State in Re RM
974 A.2d 1110 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2009)
State ex rel. R.M.
974 A.2d 1110 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2009)
Ference v. Township of Hamilton
538 F. Supp. 2d 785 (D. New Jersey, 2008)
State v. Daniels
924 A.2d 582 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2007)
State v. Dangerfield
795 A.2d 250 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2002)
State v. Dangerfield
771 A.2d 642 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2001)
State Ex Rel. Jm
771 A.2d 651 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2001)
State v. Vonderfecht
665 A.2d 1145 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1995)
State v. Doss
603 A.2d 102 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1992)
State v. Kenison
590 A.2d 708 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1990)
State v. Smith
783 P.2d 95 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 1989)
State v. Gonzalez
556 A.2d 323 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1989)
Marion v. Borough of Manasquan
555 A.2d 699 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1989)