State v. Hurse

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Hurse

470 S.W.3d 788, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 949, 2015 WL 5575083

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 22, 2015·No. No. ED 102251·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Kenneth Hurse appeals from the judgment entered on his convictions after a jury trial for murder in the first degree and armed criminal action. There was sufficient evidence to support these convictions and no reversible error in the admission of evidence. We affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Kenneth Hurse appeals from the judgment entered on his convictions after a jury trial for murder in the first degree and armed criminal action. There was sufficient evidence to support these convictions and no reversible error in the admission of evidence. We affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Hurse, 470 S.W.3d 788, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 949, 2015 WL 5575083 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

470 S.W.3d 788 (State v. Hurse) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.