State v. Hurd
This text of 303 S.W.3d 167 (State v. Hurd) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
Bradley Hurd appeals his convictions following a bench trial for driving while intoxicated, section 577.010, RSMo 2000, and driving while revoked, section 302.321, RSMo Cum.Supp.2008, and sentences to concurrent terms of six years imprisonment and one year in county jail, respectively. Hurd claims that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence obtained at a sobriety checkpoint because the checkpoint was not conducted in accordance with the guidelines set forth in State v. Welch, 755 S.W.2d 624 (Mo.App. W.D.1988). Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties. The convictions are affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
303 S.W.3d 167, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 206, 2010 WL 605292, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-hurd-moctapp-2010.