State v. Hupman

Ohio Court of Appeals

State v. Hupman

139 N.E.2d 360, 73 Ohio Law. Abs. 598

CourtOhio Court of Appeals

DecidedSeptember 10, 1954

DocketNos. 5159, 5160, 5161 and 5162

StatusPublished

This text of 139 N.E.2d 360 (State v. Hupman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Hupman, 139 N.E.2d 360, 73 Ohio Law. Abs. 598 (Ohio Ct. App. 1954).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION

By THE COURT.

Submitted on motions of the plaintiff-appellee seeking orders dismissing the appeals on law and fact for the reason that there is no authority for this Court to entertain such appeals. The judgments appealed from are ones of convicting and sentencing the defendants-appellants for refusing to testify before a committee of the General Assembly of Ohio, in violation of §12845 GC. Since these are criminál proceedings, they are not chancery cases and such appeals may not be maintained. State v. Rickman, 23 Abs 207; State v. Walls, 27 Abs 545; 2 Ohio Jur. (2d) 693.

[599]*599The motions will be sustained but the cases will be retained for determination on questions of law. The appellants will be granted leave to perfect said appeals in accordance with Supplement to Rule VII of this Court.

WISEMAN, PJ, MILLER and HORNBECK, JJ, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION

By THE COURT.

Submitted on motions of the plaintiff-appellee seeking orders dismissing the appeals on law and fact for the reason that there is no authority for this Court to entertain such appeals. The judgments appealed from are ones of convicting and sentencing the defendants-appellants for refusing to testify before a committee of the General Assembly of Ohio, in violation of §12845 GC. Since these are criminál proceedings, they are not chancery cases and such appeals may not be maintained. State v. Rickman, 23 Abs 207; State v. Walls, 27 Abs 545; 2 Ohio Jur. (2d) 693.

[599]*599The motions will be sustained but the cases will be retained for determination on questions of law. The appellants will be granted leave to perfect said appeals in accordance with Supplement to Rule VII of this Court.

WISEMAN, PJ, MILLER and HORNBECK, JJ, concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

139 N.E.2d 360, 73 Ohio Law. Abs. 598, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-hupman-ohioctapp-1954.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack