State v. Huntley

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Huntley

364 S.W.3d 235, 2012 WL 827106, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 326

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 13, 2012·No. ED 96344·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The defendant, William Huntley, appeals the judgment entered by the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis after a jury convicted him of first-degree robbery in violation of section 569.020 RSMo. (2000). The trial court sentenced the defendant as a prior and persistent felony offender to a 25-year term of imprisonment. Finding no error, we affirm.

*236 An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision.

The trial court’s judgment is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The defendant, William Huntley, appeals the judgment entered by the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis after a jury convicted him of first-degree robbery in violation of section 569.020 RSMo. (2000). The trial court sentenced the defendant as a prior and persistent felony offender to a 25-year term of imprisonment. Finding no error, we affirm.

*236 An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision.

The trial court’s judgment is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Huntley, 364 S.W.3d 235, 2012 WL 827106, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 326 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

364 S.W.3d 235 (State v. Huntley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.