State v. Hunter

44 Tex. 94
Texas Supreme Court·Decided July 1, 1875·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Roberts, Chief Justice.

The indictment was set aside upon exceptions taken to it by the defendant below.

It alleges that the defendant “ did in a court of justice, viz, in the court-house of Hopkins county, and State of Texas, at Sulphur Springs, the District Court of said county of Hopkins being then and there in session, unlawfully [95] make an aggravated assault upon one J. W. Strowd, with intent to injure him.”

It is good for a simple assault, because it is unnecessary to state the instrument or means used in committing it. (2 Bishop, 0. P.. sec. 56; State v. Croft, 15 Tex., 576, and numerous cases since following that.) It is good also for an aggravated assault, because it alleges the assault to have been committed “in a court of justice,” describing the court, when and where held, which is exactly in accordance with the code, which makes an assault aggravated “ when committed in a court of justice.” (Paschal’s Dig., art. 2150.) The court erred in setting the indictment aside. Judgment reversed and cause remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Hunter, 44 Tex. 94 (Tex. 1875).

44 Tex. 94 (State v. Hunter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Milstead v. State
19 Tex. Ct. App. 490 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1885)