State v. Hunter

44 Tex. 94
CourtTexas Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 1, 1875
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 44 Tex. 94 (State v. Hunter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Hunter, 44 Tex. 94 (Tex. 1875).

Opinion

Roberts, Chief Justice.

The indictment was set aside upon exceptions taken to it by the defendant below.

It alleges that the defendant “ did in a court of justice, viz, in the court-house of Hopkins county, and State of Texas, at Sulphur Springs, the District Court of said county of Hopkins being then and there in session, unlawfully [95]*95make an aggravated assault upon one J. W. Strowd, with intent to injure him.”

It is good for a simple assault, because it is unnecessary to state the instrument or means used in committing it. (2 Bishop, 0. P.. sec. 56; State v. Croft, 15 Tex., 576, and numerous cases since following that.) It is good also for an aggravated assault, because it alleges the assault to have been committed “in a court of justice,” describing the court, when and where held, which is exactly in accordance with the code, which makes an assault aggravated “ when committed in a court of justice.” (Paschal’s Dig., art. 2150.) The court erred in setting the indictment aside. Judgment reversed and cause remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Milstead v. State
19 Tex. Ct. App. 490 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1885)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
44 Tex. 94, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-hunter-tex-1875.