State v. Hunter

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Hunter

215 S.W.3d 742, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 326, 2007 WL 582081

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 27, 2007·No. No. ED 88697·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

State of Missouri appeals from the trial court’s judgment granting Adam Hunter’s motion to suppress evidence.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claim of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. No precedential or jurisprudential purposes would be served by an opinion restating the detailed facts and the principles of law. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their purposes only explaining the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

State of Missouri appeals from the trial court’s judgment granting Adam Hunter’s motion to suppress evidence.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claim of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. No precedential or jurisprudential purposes would be served by an opinion restating the detailed facts and the principles of law. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their purposes only explaining the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Hunter, 215 S.W.3d 742, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 326, 2007 WL 582081 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

215 S.W.3d 742 (State v. Hunter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.