State v. Hunter
This text of 54 S.W. 442 (State v. Hunter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Defendant was indicted, arraigned, tried and convicted in the circuit court of Newton county of grand larceny of a certain black horse, the property of T. B. Durham, on June 1, 1897.
Quite a voluminous bil-1 of exceptions is incorporated in the transcript sent to this court, but as no exceptions were saved to the overruling of the motions for new trial, and in [570]*570arrest of judgment, it is obvious that the matters dehors the record proper are not before us for review. [Ross v. Railroad, 141 Mo. 390; State v. Gilmore, 110 Mo. 1; State v. Gray, 149 Mo. 458.]
In the record proper we find no error whatever, and the judgment is accordingly affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
54 S.W. 442, 152 Mo. 569, 1899 Mo. LEXIS 253, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-hunter-mo-1899.