State v. Hunter

Supreme Court of Missouri

State v. Hunter

54 S.W. 442, 152 Mo. 569, 1899 Mo. LEXIS 253

Supreme Court of Missouri·Decided December 12, 1899·Published

Opinion

GANTT, P. J.

Defendant was indicted, arraigned, tried and convicted in the circuit court of Newton county of grand larceny of a certain black horse, the property of T. B. Durham, on June 1, 1897.

Quite a voluminous bil-1 of exceptions is incorporated in the transcript sent to this court, but as no exceptions were saved to the overruling of the motions for new trial, and in [570] arrest of judgment, it is obvious that the matters dehors the record proper are not before us for review. [Ross v. Railroad, 141 Mo. 390; State v. Gilmore, 110 Mo. 1; State v. Gray, 149 Mo. 458.]

In the record proper we find no error whatever, and the judgment is accordingly affirmed.

Burgess, J., concurs; Sherwood, J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

GANTT, P. J.

Defendant was indicted, arraigned, tried and convicted in the circuit court of Newton county of grand larceny of a certain black horse, the property of T. B. Durham, on June 1, 1897.

Quite a voluminous bil-1 of exceptions is incorporated in the transcript sent to this court, but as no exceptions were saved to the overruling of the motions for new trial, and in [570] arrest of judgment, it is obvious that the matters dehors the record proper are not before us for review. [Ross v. Railroad, 141 Mo. 390; State v. Gilmore, 110 Mo. 1; State v. Gray, 149 Mo. 458.]

In the record proper we find no error whatever, and the judgment is accordingly affirmed.

Burgess, J., concurs; Sherwood, J., absent.

State v. Hunter, 54 S.W. 442, 152 Mo. 569, 1899 Mo. LEXIS 253 (Mo. 1899).

Pincite

54 S.W. 442 (State v. Hunter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related