State v. Hunt

Supreme Court of New Jersey

State v. Hunt

1 N.J.L. 332

DecidedApril 15, 1795

StatusPublished

This text of 1 N.J.L. 332 (State v. Hunt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Hunt, 1 N.J.L. 332 (N.J. 1795).

Pincite

Opinion

Pee Cue.

A rule to show cause is a proper notice in all cases.

Leake and Woodruff,, for the rule, cited

2 Hawk. 417, b. 2, c. 27, § 62; 4 Bl. Com. 320, 321, to show that a certiorari was a supersedeas ; and that after it was presented all further proceedings were void. A case, also, of The State v. Bowen, in the minutes of May Term, 1781, was cited, where, for proceeding after a certiorari, the court ordered an attachment in the first instance against the justices.

[288] Per Cur. This is a mild way of proceeding. The court that issues the writ are alone to decide upon its legality. The inferior court are to obey.

Rule absolute.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pee Cue.

A rule to show cause is a proper notice in all cases.

Leake and Woodruff,, for the rule, cited

2 Hawk. 417, b. 2, c. 27, § 62; 4 Bl. Com. 320, 321, to show that a certiorari was a supersedeas ; and that after it was presented all further proceedings were void. A case, also, of The State v. Bowen, in the minutes of May Term, 1781, was cited, where, for proceeding after a certiorari, the court ordered an attachment in the first instance against the justices.

[288] Per Cur. This is a mild way of proceeding. The court that issues the writ are alone to decide upon its legality. The inferior court are to obey.

Rule absolute.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 N.J.L. 332, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-hunt-nj-1795.