State v. Hunt
766 S.E.2d 288, 367 N.C. 700, 2014 N.C. LEXIS 945
This text of 766 S.E.2d 288 (State v. Hunt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State v. Hunt, 766 S.E.2d 288, 367 N.C. 700, 2014 N.C. LEXIS 945 (N.C. 2014).
Opinion
[701]*701On defendant’s appeal arising from the dissenting opinion, the decision of the Court of Appeals is affirmed. The State’s petition for discretionary review as to an additional issue was improvidently allowed.
AFFIRMED IN PART; DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED IN PART.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
766 S.E.2d 288, 367 N.C. 700, 2014 N.C. LEXIS 945, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-hunt-nc-2014.