State v. Hunt

Supreme Court of North Carolina

State v. Hunt

659 S.E.2d 6, 362 N.C. 174, 2008 N.C. LEXIS 172

CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina

DecidedJanuary 24, 2008

DocketNo. 565P07

StatusPublished

This text of 659 S.E.2d 6 (State v. Hunt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Hunt, 659 S.E.2d 6, 362 N.C. 174, 2008 N.C. LEXIS 172 (N.C. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

This matter having come before this Court on defendant’s Motion to Review Pursuant to Rule 2, this Court notes that defendant was convicted and sentenced to life imprisonment at a time when such cases were directly appealable to the Supreme Court of North Carolina. Accordingly, this Court has jurisdiction to consider defendant’s petition, which we treat as a Petition for Writ of Certiorari. As such, defendant’s Petition for Writ of Certiorari is denied. The State’s Motion to Dismiss Petition for Review Under Rule 2 is dismissed as moot. The State’s Motion to Deny Defendant’s Motion for Petition for Writ of Certiorari is dismissed as moot.

By order of the Court in Conference, this 24th day of January, 2008.

Hudson, J. For the Court Brady, J. Recused

[175]*175[[Image here]]

[176]*176[[Image here]]

[177]*177[[Image here]]

[178]*178[[Image here]]

[179]*179[[Image here]]

[180]*180[[Image here]]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

This matter having come before this Court on defendant’s Motion to Review Pursuant to Rule 2, this Court notes that defendant was convicted and sentenced to life imprisonment at a time when such cases were directly appealable to the Supreme Court of North Carolina. Accordingly, this Court has jurisdiction to consider defendant’s petition, which we treat as a Petition for Writ of Certiorari. As such, defendant’s Petition for Writ of Certiorari is denied. The State’s Motion to Dismiss Petition for Review Under Rule 2 is dismissed as moot. The State’s Motion to Deny Defendant’s Motion for Petition for Writ of Certiorari is dismissed as moot.

By order of the Court in Conference, this 24th day of January, 2008.

Hudson, J. For the Court Brady, J. Recused

[175]*175[[Image here]]

[176]*176[[Image here]]

[177]*177[[Image here]]

[178]*178[[Image here]]

[179]*179[[Image here]]

[180]*180[[Image here]]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

659 S.E.2d 6, 362 N.C. 174, 2008 N.C. LEXIS 172, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-hunt-nc-2008.