State v. Hunt

98 S.E.2d 337, 246 N.C. 454, 1957 N.C. LEXIS 428
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided June 7, 1957·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Pee Cuexam.

The testimony of witness Torrence was the only evidence relating to the charges in the bill of indictment. The instruction complained of here is similar, in principle, to the instruction approved by this Court in S. v. Moore, 192 N.C. 209, 134 S.E. 456. This record discloses

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Hunt, 98 S.E.2d 337, 246 N.C. 454, 1957 N.C. LEXIS 428 (N.C. 1957).

98 S.E.2d 337 (State v. Hunt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Wilkins
238 S.E.2d 659 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1977)
State v. Morehead
136 S.E.2d 109 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1964)