State v. Hunt

98 S.E.2d 337, 246 N.C. 454, 1957 N.C. LEXIS 428
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedJune 7, 1957
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 98 S.E.2d 337 (State v. Hunt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Hunt, 98 S.E.2d 337, 246 N.C. 454, 1957 N.C. LEXIS 428 (N.C. 1957).

Opinion

Pee Cuexam.

The testimony of witness Torrence was the only evidence relating to the charges in the bill of indictment. The instruction complained of here is similar, in principle, to the instruction approved by this Court in S. v. Moore, 192 N.C. 209, 134 S.E. 456. This record discloses

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Wilkins
238 S.E.2d 659 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1977)
State v. Morehead
136 S.E.2d 109 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1964)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
98 S.E.2d 337, 246 N.C. 454, 1957 N.C. LEXIS 428, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-hunt-nc-1957.