State v. . Hunt

Supreme Court of North Carolina

State v. . Hunt

136 S.E. 927, 193 N.C. 833, 1927 N.C. LEXIS 475

DecidedMarch 2, 1927

StatusPublished

This text of 136 S.E. 927 (State v. . Hunt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. . Hunt, 136 S.E. 927, 193 N.C. 833, 1927 N.C. LEXIS 475 (N.C. 1927).

Pincite

Opinion

*834 Per Curiam.

We are unable to say, from the record as presented, that the irregularities in the selection of the juries, grand and petit, of which the defendant complains, were such as could not be waived, but may now be invoked and brought to the aid of the defendant on his motion in arrest of judgment.

The defendant was not represented by counsel at the trial, and his appeal is from the court’s refusal to arrest the judgment. The irregularities were not sufficient to vitiate the trial.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*834 Per Curiam.

We are unable to say, from the record as presented, that the irregularities in the selection of the juries, grand and petit, of which the defendant complains, were such as could not be waived, but may now be invoked and brought to the aid of the defendant on his motion in arrest of judgment.

The defendant was not represented by counsel at the trial, and his appeal is from the court’s refusal to arrest the judgment. The irregularities were not sufficient to vitiate the trial.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

136 S.E. 927, 193 N.C. 833, 1927 N.C. LEXIS 475, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-hunt-nc-1927.