State v. Hunt

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Hunt

834 S.W.2d 843, 1992 Mo. App. LEXIS 1245, 1992 WL 166182

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Hunt. Read the opinion of the Court — 1989 Mo. App. LEXIS 1660 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided July 21, 1992·No. Nos. WD 43344, WD 45269·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Marvin D. Hunt appeals his conviction for possession of cocaine, § 195.202, RSMo Cum.Supp.1989, a class C felony, and possession of amphetamine, § 195.202, a class C felony, and he appeals denial of his Rule 29.15 postconviction motion. The appeals are consolidated. Mr. Hunt was convicted as a prior offender under § 558.016, RSMo 1986.

The judgment of conviction is affirmed. The judgment denying Mr. Hunt's postcon-viction Rule 29.15 motion is affirmed. Rules 84.16(b) and 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Marvin D. Hunt appeals his conviction for possession of cocaine, § 195.202, RSMo Cum.Supp.1989, a class C felony, and possession of amphetamine, § 195.202, a class C felony, and he appeals denial of his Rule 29.15 postconviction motion. The appeals are consolidated. Mr. Hunt was convicted as a prior offender under § 558.016, RSMo 1986.

The judgment of conviction is affirmed. The judgment denying Mr. Hunt's postcon-viction Rule 29.15 motion is affirmed. Rules 84.16(b) and 30.25(b).

State v. Hunt, 834 S.W.2d 843, 1992 Mo. App. LEXIS 1245, 1992 WL 166182 (Mo. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

834 S.W.2d 843 (State v. Hunt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.