State v. Hunnicutt

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

State v. Hunnicutt

199 S.E.2d 504, 19 N.C. App. 581, 1973 N.C. App. LEXIS 1711

CourtCourt of Appeals of North Carolina

DecidedOctober 10, 1973

DocketNo. 7315SC584

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 199 S.E.2d 504 (State v. Hunnicutt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Hunnicutt, 199 S.E.2d 504, 19 N.C. App. 581, 1973 N.C. App. LEXIS 1711 (N.C. Ct. App. 1973).

Pincite

Opinion

HEDRICK, Judge.

The record reveals defendant, Jeffrey N. Hunnicutt, oh 17 April 1973, pleaded guilty to the charge of armed robbery. There is no right of appeal from a plea of guilty after 30 March 1973. G.S. 15-180.2. Therefore, We must treat the proceeding as a petition for writ of certiorari to review the proceedings in the superior court. Accordingly, we have reviewed the record which affirmatively discloses that the defendant, represented by court appointed counsel, freely, understanding^, and voluntarily pleaded guilty to a proper bill of indictment and that the prison sentence of. not less than 20 years nor more than 25 years imposed in. the'judgment is within the limits prescribed by statute for the charge in the bill of indictment. Therefore, the petition for a writ of certiorari is denied and the appeal dismissed.

Judges Parker and Baley concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HEDRICK, Judge.

The record reveals defendant, Jeffrey N. Hunnicutt, oh 17 April 1973, pleaded guilty to the charge of armed robbery. There is no right of appeal from a plea of guilty after 30 March 1973. G.S. 15-180.2. Therefore, We must treat the proceeding as a petition for writ of certiorari to review the proceedings in the superior court. Accordingly, we have reviewed the record which affirmatively discloses that the defendant, represented by court appointed counsel, freely, understanding^, and voluntarily pleaded guilty to a proper bill of indictment and that the prison sentence of. not less than 20 years nor more than 25 years imposed in. the'judgment is within the limits prescribed by statute for the charge in the bill of indictment. Therefore, the petition for a writ of certiorari is denied and the appeal dismissed.

Judges Parker and Baley concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

199 S.E.2d 504, 19 N.C. App. 581, 1973 N.C. App. LEXIS 1711, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-hunnicutt-ncctapp-1973.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack