State v. Hung Van Nguyen

433 P.3d 820, 192 Wash. 2d 1016
CourtWashington Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 6, 2019
DocketNo. 95510-7
StatusPublished

This text of 433 P.3d 820 (State v. Hung Van Nguyen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Hung Van Nguyen, 433 P.3d 820, 192 Wash. 2d 1016 (Wash. 2019).

Opinion

¶ 1 Department I of the Court, composed of Chief Justice Fairhurst and Justices Johnson, Owens, Wiggins and Gordon McCloud, considered at its February 5, 2019, Motion Calendar whether review should be granted pursuant to RAP 13.4(b) and unanimously agreed that the following order be entered.

¶ 2 IT IS ORDERED:

¶ 3 That the petition for review is granted only on the issue whether the persistent offender sentence violates the state or federal prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment. Any party may serve and file a supplemental brief within 30 days of the date of this order, see RAP 13.7(d).

For the Court/s/ Fairhurst, C.J. CHIEF JUSTICE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
433 P.3d 820, 192 Wash. 2d 1016, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-hung-van-nguyen-wash-2019.