State v. Humphries
357 S.E.2d 359, 320 N.C. 165, 1987 N.C. LEXIS 2156
Opinion
After reviewing the record and briefs and hearing oral arguments on the questions presented, we conclude that the petitions for discretionary review were improvidently allowed.
Petitions for discretionary review improvidently allowed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Humphries, 357 S.E.2d 359, 320 N.C. 165, 1987 N.C. LEXIS 2156 (N.C. 1987).
357 S.E.2d 359 (State v. Humphries) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Campbell
759 S.E.2d 380 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2014)
State v. Keitt
571 S.E.2d 35 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2002)