State v. Humphrey

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Humphrey

201 S.W.3d 67, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1340, 2006 WL 2597950

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedSeptember 12, 2006

DocketED 86893

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 201 S.W.3d 67 (State v. Humphrey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Humphrey, 201 S.W.3d 67, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1340, 2006 WL 2597950 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant Donald Humphrey (Humphrey) appeals the decision of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis (Court), after the Honorable Michael B. Calvin found him guilty of Trafficking Drugs in the Second Degree, Section 195.223 1 and Unlawful Use of Drug Paraphernalia, a misdemeanor, Section 195.233. Humphrey was sentenced, as a persistent drug offender and a persistent felony offender, to concurrent sentences of twenty years and one year, respectively.

On appeal, Humphrey argues that the Court erred and plainly erred when it allowed two police officers to testify about statements made to a 911 dispatcher by an anonymous caller who did not testify at trial. Humphrey claims this evidence was inadmissible hearsay. The Court admitted the testimony as evidence of subsequent police conduct.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the Record on Appeal, and we find no error of law in this case. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

1

. All statutory references are to RSMo (2000).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI