State v. Humphrey

559 So. 2d 733, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 2760, 1990 WL 48616
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 18, 1990
DocketNo. 89-00489
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 559 So. 2d 733 (State v. Humphrey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Humphrey, 559 So. 2d 733, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 2760, 1990 WL 48616 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The State of Florida appeals the dismissal of an information against the appellee, Jack Humphrey. Humphrey was charged with violating section 847.011, Florida Statutes (1987), by possessing or distributing obscene materials. The trial court found the statutory definition of obscenity unconstitutionally vague and the statute a violation of the right of privacy guaranteed by the Florida Constitution. We reverse.

The order of dismissal was entered on December 15, 1988. This court subsequently upheld the constitutionality of section 847.011, on both grounds raised in this appeal in State v. Long, 544 So.2d 219 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989), jurisdiction accepted Long v. State, 550 So.2d 467 (Fla.1989). Accordingly, the dismissal in this case is reversed.

SCHEB, A.C.J., and FRANK and THREADGILL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wilson v. State
559 So. 2d 733 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
559 So. 2d 733, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 2760, 1990 WL 48616, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-humphrey-fladistctapp-1990.