State v. Humphrey

District Court of Appeal of Florida

State v. Humphrey

363 So. 2d 392, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 16795

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedOctober 4, 1978

DocketNo. II-321

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 363 So. 2d 392 (State v. Humphrey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Humphrey, 363 So. 2d 392, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 16795 (Fla. Ct. App. 1978).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The State appeals an order granting ap-pellee/defendant’s motion to discharge under the speedy trial rule, Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.191(a)(2). Defendant’s demand for speedy trial, filed prior to the filing of the-information, was a nullity and was ineffective as a demand for speedy trial entitling defendant to discharge under Rule 3.191(a)(2). State v. Gravlee, 276 So.2d 480 (Fla.1973); State ex rel. Hanks v. Goodman, 253 So.2d 129 (Fla.1971); State v. Hill, 299 So.2d 625 (Fla. 1st DCA 1974), quashed in part 313 So.2d 766 (Fla.1975). Accordingly, the order discharging defendant under the speedy trial rule is reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings consistent herewith.

McCORD, C. J., and MILLS and BOYER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The State appeals an order granting ap-pellee/defendant’s motion to discharge under the speedy trial rule, Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.191(a)(2). Defendant’s demand for speedy trial, filed prior to the filing of the-information, was a nullity and was ineffective as a demand for speedy trial entitling defendant to discharge under Rule 3.191(a)(2). State v. Gravlee, 276 So.2d 480 (Fla.1973); State ex rel. Hanks v. Goodman, 253 So.2d 129 (Fla.1971); State v. Hill, 299 So.2d 625 (Fla. 1st DCA 1974), quashed in part 313 So.2d 766 (Fla.1975). Accordingly, the order discharging defendant under the speedy trial rule is reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings consistent herewith.

McCORD, C. J., and MILLS and BOYER, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

363 So. 2d 392, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 16795, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-humphrey-fladistctapp-1978.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack