State v. Hulsey

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Hulsey

424 S.W.3d 464, 2014 WL 931052, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 280

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMarch 11, 2014

DocketNo. ED 99518

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 424 S.W.3d 464 (State v. Hulsey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Hulsey, 424 S.W.3d 464, 2014 WL 931052, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 280 (Mo. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Demetrius Hulsey (Defendant) appeals the judgment of conviction entered by the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis after a jury found him guilty of two counts of first-degree robbery. Defendant claims the trial court erred by denying his motion to suppress and admitting into evidence [465]*465his statements to police because the statements were obtained in violation of his privilege against compulsory self-incrimination.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. We have, however, prepared a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 80.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI