Home/Ohio Supreme Court/State v. Hull

State v. Hull

643 N.E.2d 546, 71 Ohio St. 3d 292, 1994 Ohio LEXIS 3004
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided December 23, 1994·No. No. 94-2005·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The motion to supplement the record is denied, and the judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed for the reasons stated in its opinion.

Judgment affirmed.

Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Hull, 643 N.E.2d 546, 71 Ohio St. 3d 292, 1994 Ohio LEXIS 3004 (Ohio 1994).

643 N.E.2d 546 (State v. Hull) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. McNeal, Unpublished Decision (9-10-2002)
Ohio Court of Appeals, 2002
State v. Wheatt, Unpublished Decision (1-31-2002)
Ohio Court of Appeals, 2002
State v. Northern, Unpublished Decision (12-26-2001)
Ohio Court of Appeals, 2001
State v. Williams, Unpublished Decision (9-17-2001)
Ohio Court of Appeals, 2001
State v. Walker, Unpublished Decision (6-20-2000)
Ohio Court of Appeals, 2000
State v. Lopez, Unpublished Decision (5-11-2000)
Ohio Court of Appeals, 2000