State v. Hughley

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Hughley

247 S.W.3d 23, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 269, 2008 WL 563844

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMarch 4, 2008

DocketED 89392

StatusPublished

This text of 247 S.W.3d 23 (State v. Hughley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Hughley, 247 S.W.3d 23, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 269, 2008 WL 563844 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Jamal Hughley appeals the trial court’s judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of burglary in the second degree. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Jamal Hughley appeals the trial court’s judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of burglary in the second degree. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

247 S.W.3d 23, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 269, 2008 WL 563844, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-hughley-moctapp-2008.