State v. Hughley

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Hughley

247 S.W.3d 23, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 269, 2008 WL 563844

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 4, 2008·No. ED 89392·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Jamal Hughley appeals the trial court’s judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of burglary in the second degree. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Jamal Hughley appeals the trial court’s judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of burglary in the second degree. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Hughley, 247 S.W.3d 23, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 269, 2008 WL 563844 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

247 S.W.3d 23 (State v. Hughley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.