State v. Hughes

999 P.2d 1215, 167 Or. App. 158, 2000 Ore. App. LEXIS 712
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedMay 3, 2000
DocketC980111MC; CA A103826
StatusPublished

This text of 999 P.2d 1215 (State v. Hughes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Hughes, 999 P.2d 1215, 167 Or. App. 158, 2000 Ore. App. LEXIS 712 (Or. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Appellant, an alleged mentally ill person, appeals an order of civil commitment. He argues that the trial court erred in failing to advise him of his statutory rights as required by ORS 426.100(1). The state concedes that the trial court failed to provide the advice that the statute requires. We accept the state’s concession.

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 426.100
Oregon § 426.100

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
999 P.2d 1215, 167 Or. App. 158, 2000 Ore. App. LEXIS 712, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-hughes-orctapp-2000.