State v. Hughes

Court of Appeals of Oregon

State v. Hughes

855 P.2d 667, 121 Or. App. 675, 1993 Ore. App. LEXIS 1152

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedJuly 14, 1993

DocketCF91-0222; CA A72414

StatusPublished

This text of 855 P.2d 667 (State v. Hughes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Hughes, 855 P.2d 667, 121 Or. App. 675, 1993 Ore. App. LEXIS 1152 (Or. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Pursuant to plea negotiations, defendant pled guilty to two counts of robbery in the first degree and two counts of kidnapping in the second degree, ORS 164.415; ORS 163.225, and the state dismissed four other counts. He challenges the consecutive sentences imposed on the kidnapping convictions, arguing that there was no evidence to support the court’s finding that the commission of kidnapping was not merely incidental to the robbery. ORS 137.123.

We do not address defendant’s assignment of error. There is no review of a sentence that has resulted from an agreement, as defendant’s sentence did here. ORS 138.222 (2)(d); State v. Adams, 315 Or 359, 847 P2d 397 (1993); State v. Tanner, 121 Or App 104, 854 P2d 941 (1993); State v. Kilborn, 120 Or App 462, 852 P2d 935 (1993); State v. Johnston, 120 Or App 165, 851 P2d 1196 (1993).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

Pursuant to plea negotiations, defendant pled guilty to two counts of robbery in the first degree and two counts of kidnapping in the second degree, ORS 164.415; ORS 163.225, and the state dismissed four other counts. He challenges the consecutive sentences imposed on the kidnapping convictions, arguing that there was no evidence to support the court’s finding that the commission of kidnapping was not merely incidental to the robbery. ORS 137.123.

We do not address defendant’s assignment of error. There is no review of a sentence that has resulted from an agreement, as defendant’s sentence did here. ORS 138.222 (2)(d); State v. Adams, 315 Or 359, 847 P2d 397 (1993); State v. Tanner, 121 Or App 104, 854 P2d 941 (1993); State v. Kilborn, 120 Or App 462, 852 P2d 935 (1993); State v. Johnston, 120 Or App 165, 851 P2d 1196 (1993).

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

855 P.2d 667, 121 Or. App. 675, 1993 Ore. App. LEXIS 1152, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-hughes-orctapp-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack