State v. . Hughes
This text of 137 S.E. 819 (State v. . Hughes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We have carefully considered the facts as set forth in the special verdict in this case. We think the ordinance valid under the authority of Express Co. v. Charlotte, 186 N. C., p. 668. S. v. Denson, 189 N. C., p. 173. 3 C. S., 2612 (a) (Public Laws 1921, ch. 2, sec. 29), is the law now in force under which the Express Co. case, supra, was decided and the ordinance in the present case adopted. The case of S. v. Jones, 191 N. C., p. 371, is not in conflict. See Thompson v. Lumberton, 182 N. C., p. 260.
The judgment of the court below is'
Reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
137 S.E. 819, 193 N.C. 847, 1927 N.C. LEXIS 495, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-hughes-nc-1927.