State v. . Hughes
This text of 126 S.E. 926 (State v. . Hughes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The only assignment of error is based upon defendants’ exception to the refusal of the court' to allow their motion, ■ at the close of all the evidence, for judgment of nonsuit. C. S., 4643. We do not deem it necessary to set out the evidence, which is stated in the case on appeal. The testimony of the witness, if found by the jury to be true, was sufficient evidence to sustain the allegations of the indictment. There was no error in the refusal of defendants’ motion. No other error is assigned by defendants. The evidence was sufficient to sustain the verdict. Upon the whole record there is
No error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
126 S.E. 926, 189 N.C. 831, 1925 N.C. LEXIS 413, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-hughes-nc-1925.