State v. Hughes

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Hughes

556 S.W.3d 97

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJune 5, 2018

DocketNo. ED 105700

StatusPublished

This text of 556 S.W.3d 97 (State v. Hughes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Hughes, 556 S.W.3d 97 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Edward Hughes appeals from the trial court's judgment entered upon a jury verdict convicting him of one count of unlawful possession of a firearm by a felon, unlawful possession of a firearm in the presence of heroin, three counts of possession of a controlled substance, and one count of possession of drug paraphernalia. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court committed no reversible error. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Edward Hughes appeals from the trial court's judgment entered upon a jury verdict convicting him of one count of unlawful possession of a firearm by a felon, unlawful possession of a firearm in the presence of heroin, three counts of possession of a controlled substance, and one count of possession of drug paraphernalia. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court committed no reversible error. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

556 S.W.3d 97, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-hughes-moctapp-2018.