State v. Hughes
This text of 212 So. 2d 65 (State v. Hughes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
By notice of appeal, the State attempts to review an interlocutory order in a criminal matter pursuant to § 924.-071(1), Fla.Stat., 1967, F.S.A.1
The order in question purports to relate to the suppression of an admission by the defendant. If in fact there was an admission, it was not to the crime charged and, therefore, we find the order to be not appealable. Under such circumstances, the State urges us to consider and review the order by considering its notice of appeal as a petition for common [66]*66law certiorari [see: State v. Coyle, Fla. App.1966, 181 So.2d 671], which we have done.
Examining the transcript to determine if the trial court has departed from the essential requirements of the law in entering the order here under review, we fail to find that he has and decline to exercise our discretion in entertaining the petition. See: Brinson v. Tharin, 99 Fla. 696, 127 So. 313; Gay v. City of Gainesville, Fla.App.1966, 186 So.2d 41.
Petition for certiorari denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
212 So. 2d 65, 1968 Fla. App. LEXIS 5252, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-hughes-fladistctapp-1968.