State v. Huggins

Supreme Court of North Carolina

State v. Huggins

367 N.C. 203

Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided August 29, 2013·No. No. 459P00-3·Published

Opinion

ORDER

Defendant’s petition for writ of mandamus is denied. This case is remanded to the trial court for determination of whether defendant has received appointed counsel and, if not, for a determination of whether the Appellate Defender should be appointed as counsel for defendant to determine the merit of filing a Petition for Writ of Certiorari with the Court of Appeals.

s/ Beasley, J.

For the Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Defendant’s petition for writ of mandamus is denied. This case is remanded to the trial court for determination of whether defendant has received appointed counsel and, if not, for a determination of whether the Appellate Defender should be appointed as counsel for defendant to determine the merit of filing a Petition for Writ of Certiorari with the Court of Appeals.

s/ Beasley, J.

For the Court

State v. Huggins, 367 N.C. 203 (N.C. 2013).

Pincite

367 N.C. 203 (State v. Huggins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.