State v. Huffman

Ohio Supreme Court

State v. Huffman

114 Ohio St. 3d 433

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided September 19, 2007·No. No. 2006-0799·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed with respect to the issues presented in Proposition of Law Nos. I and II on the authority of State v. Tooley, 114 Ohio St.3d 366, 2007-Ohio-3698, 872 N.E.2d 894.

{¶ 2} As to Proposition of Law No. Ill, the cause is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently accepted.

Moyer, C.J., Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger and Cupp, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed with respect to the issues presented in Proposition of Law Nos. I and II on the authority of State v. Tooley, 114 Ohio St.3d 366, 2007-Ohio-3698, 872 N.E.2d 894.

{¶ 2} As to Proposition of Law No. Ill, the cause is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently accepted.

Moyer, C.J., Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger and Cupp, JJ., concur.

State v. Huffman, 114 Ohio St. 3d 433 (Ohio 2007).

Pincite

114 Ohio St. 3d 433 (State v. Huffman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related