State v. Huffman

Ohio Supreme Court

State v. Huffman

114 Ohio St. 3d 433

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedSeptember 19, 2007

DocketNo. 2006-0799

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 114 Ohio St. 3d 433 (State v. Huffman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Huffman, 114 Ohio St. 3d 433 (Ohio 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed with respect to the issues presented in Proposition of Law Nos. I and II on the authority of State v. Tooley, 114 Ohio St.3d 366, 2007-Ohio-3698, 872 N.E.2d 894.

{¶ 2} As to Proposition of Law No. Ill, the cause is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently accepted.

Moyer, C.J., Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger and Cupp, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed with respect to the issues presented in Proposition of Law Nos. I and II on the authority of State v. Tooley, 114 Ohio St.3d 366, 2007-Ohio-3698, 872 N.E.2d 894.

{¶ 2} As to Proposition of Law No. Ill, the cause is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently accepted.

Moyer, C.J., Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger and Cupp, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

114 Ohio St. 3d 433, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-huffman-ohio-2007.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack