State v. Huffman

852 N.E.2d 187, 110 Ohio St. 3d 1437
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided August 2, 2006·No. 2006-0799·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Hamilton App. No. C-050044, 165 Ohio App.3d 518, 2006-Ohio-1106. Discretionary appeal accepted on Proposition of Law Nos. I, II, and III; cause held for the decision in 2006-0105 and 2006-0216, State v. Tooley, Portage App. No. 2004-P-0064, 2005-Ohio-6709; and briefing schedule stayed.

Resnick, Pfeifer and Lanzinger, JJ., would accept the appeal on all Propositions of Law. O’Connor, J., would accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. I only.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Huffman, 852 N.E.2d 187, 110 Ohio St. 3d 1437 (Ohio 2006).

852 N.E.2d 187 (State v. Huffman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. McCown, Unpublished Decision (11-16-2006)
2006 Ohio 6040 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2006)