State v. Huffman

207 N.W.2d 696, 190 Neb. 319, 1973 Neb. LEXIS 693
Nebraska Supreme Court·Decided June 1, 1973·No. 38904·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

. Boslaugh, J.

The defendant’s conviction of forgery was affirmed in State v. Huffman, 185 Neb. 417, 176 N. W. 2d 506. In a prior post conviction proceeding, sentences on two counts were vacated but relief was otherwise denied. State v. Huffman, 186 Neb. 809, 186 N. W. 2d 715.

In this second proceeding under section 29-3001, R. S. Supp., 1972, the defendant has alleged no basis for further relief. The trial court is not required to entertain successive motions for similar relief from the same prisoner. State v. Pilgrim, 188 Neb. 213, 196 N. W. 2d 162.

*320 The judgment of the District Court is affirmed.

Affirmed.

White, C. J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Huffman, 207 N.W.2d 696, 190 Neb. 319, 1973 Neb. LEXIS 693 (Neb. 1973).

207 N.W.2d 696 (State v. Huffman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Haskett
233 N.W.2d 782 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1975)
State v. Hall
231 N.W.2d 123 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1975)