State v. Huffman
This text of 207 N.W.2d 696 (State v. Huffman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The defendant’s conviction of forgery was affirmed in State v. Huffman, 185 Neb. 417, 176 N. W. 2d 506. In a prior post conviction proceeding, sentences on two counts were vacated but relief was otherwise denied. State v. Huffman, 186 Neb. 809, 186 N. W. 2d 715.
In this second proceeding under section 29-3001, R. S. Supp., 1972, the defendant has alleged no basis for further relief. The trial court is not required to entertain successive motions for similar relief from the same prisoner. State v. Pilgrim, 188 Neb. 213, 196 N. W. 2d 162.
*320 The judgment of the District Court is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
207 N.W.2d 696, 190 Neb. 319, 1973 Neb. LEXIS 693, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-huffman-neb-1973.